Where does your hiring data live? If you’re managing hiring in spreadsheets and emails or using a rigid applicant tracking system (ATS), then it’s more than likely you’re missing out on crucial recruitment intelligence. Without a single, unifying source of truth for hiring data, recruitment decisions are based on fragmented or incomplete information.
This blog examines:
- The limitations of manual and fragmented hiring data
- How you know when your ATS is the problem
- How to turn recruitment data into better hiring decisions
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) bring all your hiring data together in one place, giving you a complete picture of your recruitment process from requisition to onboarding. So much more than ‘just’ candidate management or workflow tools, the right ATS software turns recruitment activity into measurable insights; these help by reducing inefficiencies, identifying bottlenecks and optimising hiring outcomes over time.
So, is your current applicant management software giving you all the intel or is your data MIA? Let’s take a closer look.
The limitations of manual and fragmented hiring data
If your applicant tracking system software is rigid, or your candidate information is kept across a variety of spreadsheets, emails and informal conversations, then hiring data becomes fragmented and limited. It’s difficult to get a clear picture of how your hiring is performing. Common pain points you might experience are:
- Inconsistent tracking between roles and hiring managers. If hiring managers hire for similar admin roles, but move through the hiring stages differently, there’s no clear data on whether that role type is genuinely quick or easy to fill, or whether one manager has a faster sign-off process.
- Limited visibility into hiring funnel performance. If you had 80 applicants and made two hires but have no visibility of how many made it through initial screening, interview or offer stage, then you can’t determine where your process might be causing drop-off.
- Difficulty identifying patterns across multiple vacancies. If you’re repeatedly losing candidates at offer stage, but can’t produce a cross-vacancy report, it will be difficult to work out if the problem is salary, process length or a specific role type that’s driving the issue.
Without a comprehensive view of all hiring activity, and consistent recruitment practices, it’s almost impossible to know how or where to improve your hiring process.